SARS-CoV-2 treatment strategy derived from a human pluripotent stem cell model
In a recent study posted to the bioRxiv* preprint server, researchers in Australia explored the molecular mechanisms of the pulmonary and cardiac complications caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using human stem-cell-derived cardiac and lung cells.
Background
Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is primarily a respiratory
disease. About 80% of infections are clinically mild or asymptomatic.
Progression to severe illness is associated with lower respiratory tract
involvement with pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pulmonary
fibrosis has been reported in survivors of COVID-19.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electrocardiographs
(ECG) have detected cardiac complications such as myocardial injury,
arrhythmias, and thromboembolisms in a large number of recovering COVID-19
patients. In addition, autopsies have also detected spike (S) protein antigen
and SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the heart tissue of patients who succumbed to COVID-19.
The SARS-CoV-2 S protein initiates infection by binding to
the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the host cell surface.
Host cell proteases such as furin cleave the S protein into two subunits — S1
and S2. The subsequent fusion of the viral and host cell membranes requires the
cleavage of S1 from S2 by serine proteases or cathepsins. Tissue tropism of the
virus is determined by the expression of either ACE2 and serine proteases, or
ACE2 and cathepsins, which differs across the respiratory, pulmonary, cardiac,
renal, and digestive systems.
About the study
The present study used human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)
to generate functional lung and heart cells. The stem cell-derived cardiac
cultures and lung alveolar type II (AT2) epithelial cells could be infected
with SARS-CoV-2. Vero cells or African green monkey kidney epithelial cells,
extensively used in COVID-19 research, were also used in this study for
comparisons.
These cells were used in paired experiments to determine the
similarities and differences in mechanisms and factors influencing COVID-19
manifestations in the lungs and the heart.
The team used clustered regularly interspaced short
palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9) mediated knockout of
the ACE2 receptor to understand its importance in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Additionally, small molecule inhibitors were used to tease out the different
mechanisms of viral entry. They also used phosphoproteomics and transcriptome
profiling to understand differences in cellular responses during SARS-CoV-2
infections.
Results
The study's significant findings indicated that while all
three cell types were dependent on the presence of ACE2 receptors, the
downstream processing of the viral S protein was along different pathways. For
example, in lung AT2 cells, the cleavage of the S protein was carried out by
TMPRSS2 serine proteases on the host cell membrane, while the viral entry into
heart cells was through the endosomal pathway through cathepsin-mediated
cleavage of the S1 and S2 subunits.
Entry inhibition assays using TMPRSS2 inhibitor Camostat
mesylate prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection of lung AT2 cells, highlighting the
role of serine proteases in the viral entry in lung cells. Similar assays with
CA-074 Me, a Cathepsin B and L inhibitor, blocked viral entry into cardiac
cells.
Aborted SARS-CoV-2 infection in knockout ACE2 lung and heart
cells demonstrated that ACE2 receptors were essential for viral infection.
However, using a combination of anti-ACE2 antibodies blocked SARS-CoV-2
infection in lung and heart tissue, but low doses of anti-ACE2 antibodies
prevented viral infection only in cardiac cells. These results, combined with
ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction
(qPCR) analyses, showed that lung AT2 cells had a higher expression of ACE2
receptors than cardiac cells.
Furthermore, the viral infection resulted in a strong
interferon response in cardiac cells but not lung AT2 cells. The results from
the phosphoproteomics analysis also showed that the infection activated
different pathways in lung AT2 and cardiac cells.
Conclusions
Overall, the results revealed significant differences in the
mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cardiac and pulmonary cells and tissue.
While viral entry begins in both cells with ACE2 receptor binding, subsequent
pathways of viral infection differ considerably with the spike protein
undergoing serine protease cleavage in lung AT2 cells and endosomal cathepsin
cleavage in cardiac cells.
The authors believe that the differential spike protein
cleavage and the variance in ACE2 receptor expression in both these cells
indicate the need for improved antiviral therapy and the inclusion of
combinations of drugs to target both endosomal and membrane protease pathways
of viral entry. They suggest using drugs that target serine/arginine-rich
splicing factor protein kinase-1 (SRPK1) and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK).
The study also highlighted the importance of using stem-cell-derived cell models other than immortalized cell lines like Vero cells to test the antiviral efficacy and cytotoxicity of COVID-19 therapies.
*Important notice
bioRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are
not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide
clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established
information.
Journal reference:
Parallel use of pluripotent human stem cell lung and heart
models provide new insights for treatment of SARS-CoV-2: Rajeev Rudraraju,
Matthew J Gartner, Jessica A Neil, Elizabeth S Stout, Joseph Chen, Elise J
Needham, Michael See, Charley Mackenzie-Kludas, Leo Yi Yang, Mingyang Wang,
Hayley Pointer, Kathy Karavendzas, Dad Abu-Bonsrah, Damien Drew, Yu Bo Yang
Sun, Jia Ping Tan, Guizhi Sun, Abbas Salavaty, Natalie Charitakis, Hieu T Nim,
Peter D Currie, Wai-Hong Tham, Enzo Porrello, Jose Polo, Sean J Humphrey,
Mirana Ramialison, David A Elliott, and Kanta Subbarao. bioRxiv. 2022. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.20.508614,
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.20.508614v1
No comments